Skip to content

Model Publishing Approval ​

This scenario guides operators through reviewing a model publishing request and verifying the decision, publication scope, and resulting visibility.

Applicable Roles ​

  • Platform Operator processing model reviews
  • Model Provider tracking the review result

Target Outcome ​

  • The reviewer identifies the model, provider, publication area, and version.
  • Model information, protocol connectivity, billing, rate limits, and visibility are checked.
  • Approval or rejection includes a clear, traceable reason.
  • An approved model is visible, testable, or callable within the intended scope.

Before You Start ​

  1. The account has Model Services model review permission.
  2. Publication, billing, rate-limit, and content governance rules are clear.
  3. Connectivity testing is complete and review material contains no real credentials.

Procedure ​

StepActionManualCompletion Signal
1Open Approvals > Model Reviews and filter pending requestsModel ReviewsThe target request is pending
2Check model, provider, source, and publication areaModel ReviewsBasic information matches the request
3Check protocol test, modalities, tokens, billing, and rate limitsModel ReviewsCritical configuration is complete and compliant
4Approve or reject with a specific reasonModel ReviewsStatus and review comment are saved
5Check status with the Provider AccountMy ModelsThe provider sees the result and reason
6Verify visibility for an approved public modelModel MarketplaceIntended users can find the model

At the start of review, use the Model Reviews list to locate the request by provider, version, scope, submission time, and status.

Locate the request in Model Reviews

Completion Checklist ​

Purpose: These are the exit criteria for the current feature task. Use them to decide whether the result is observable and reviewable and whether you can continue to the next step in the scenario. They do not repeat the procedure; if any item fails, follow the troubleshooting section below.

CheckPass Criteria
1Request, version, provider, and publication scope are correct.
2Protocol, billing, and rate-limit settings have verification evidence.
3Status, comment, reviewer, and time are traceable.
4A rejection tells the provider exactly what to change and retest.
5An approved model is visible only in the intended scope.

Troubleshooting ​

SymptomCheck First
Request is missingStatus filter, provider, submission time, and permission
Approval cannot be submittedRequired settings, protocol test, publication area, and review permission
Approved model is not visiblePublication time, model state, publication area, and user visibility
Provider cannot act on rejectionWhether the review comment names the field, rule, and validation method